Packaging: Update to 1.0#466
Conversation
9ee0522 to
bb89a05
Compare
|
To test this out we should rebase on main and also add |
Signed-off-by: tldahlgren <dahlgren1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: tldahlgren <dahlgren1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: tldahlgren <dahlgren1@llnl.gov>
…points) Signed-off-by: tldahlgren <dahlgren1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: tldahlgren <dahlgren1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: tldahlgren <dahlgren1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: tldahlgren <dahlgren1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: tldahlgren <dahlgren1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: tldahlgren <dahlgren1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: tldahlgren <dahlgren1@llnl.gov>
7dce079 to
24491a6
Compare
It appears in |
|
The changes in are for the Should the commit be dropped since a rebase should pick up the proper updates? |
Signed-off-by: tldahlgren <dahlgren1@llnl.gov>
2ac9f05 to
8beebcd
Compare
🤔 Forgot to pull before adding 'spack repo list' commit. |
4a3c19f to
e50bdb2
Compare
Signed-off-by: tldahlgren <35777542+tldahlgren@users.noreply.github.com>
…ilder Signed-off-by: tldahlgren <35777542+tldahlgren@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: tldahlgren <35777542+tldahlgren@users.noreply.github.com>
d322ce7 to
2e116ce
Compare
Signed-off-by: tldahlgren <35777542+tldahlgren@users.noreply.github.com>
6b6f095 to
c014d8e
Compare
Signed-off-by: tldahlgren <35777542+tldahlgren@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: tldahlgren <35777542+tldahlgren@users.noreply.github.com>
@alecbcs @becker33 I still haven't enabled |
Signed-off-by: tldahlgren <35777542+tldahlgren@users.noreply.github.com>
eb37184 to
1348447
Compare
|
Packaging depends on stacks only because that's the way we run the tutorial and we want the outputs to be consistent with how users will see them on the day. I patched packaging into CI so we can test that it executes. |
22206c6 to
b615a1c
Compare
alecbcs
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Passed checks. Looks good to me.
This PR brings the
Package Creation Tutorialup to v1.0.